IV Amisulpride vs. Ondansetron to Prevent PONV in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgery

calendar
3 Aug, 26

 

Introduction

Patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures are burdened with a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Intravenous amisulpride, a dopamine (D2, D3) receptor antagonist, has been approved and has been found to be safe and effective in managing PONV in nonneurosurgical settings. Nevertheless, the role of IV amisulpride has not been studied well in neurosurgical patients.

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety of IV amisulpride (5 mg) vs. IV ondansetron (4 mg) in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumour surgery

Patient profile

  • Adult patients (age 18 to 65 years) scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy for tumour surgery under general anaesthesia.

Methods

Study Design

  • A singlecentre, doubleblind, randomised study.

Treatment Strategy

  • The study participants were randomised 1:1 to receive either IV amisulpride (5 mg) with IV paracetamol 1 gm or IV ondansetron (4 mg) with IV paracetamol 1 gm intraoperatively, administered 30 minutes before skin closure. 

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

  • The incidence of PONV [defined as any episode of nausea (subjective unpleasant sensation associated with the urge to vomit) or vomiting] within the first 24 hours postoperatively. 

Secondary Outcomes

  • Nausea severity (assessed using a 4-point numerical scale; 0 = no nausea, 4 = continuous vomiting)
  • The need for rescue antiemetic medications
  • The incidence of treatmentrelated adverse events (AEs) 

Results

  • The final analysis included 100 patients. 
  • Patients treated with amisulpride had a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, as compared to those treated with ondansetron (Table 1).
  • Patients treated with amisulpride, vs. those treated with ondansetron had a significantly lower severity of nausea during the first four postoperative hours (Table 1). 
  • Furthermore, patients receiving amisulpride required fewer rescue antiemetics, as compared to those treated with ondansetron (Table 1). 

Table 1: Outcomes in the study groups

Outcomes

Amisulpride Group (N=50)

Ondansetron Group (N=50)

P value

Incidence of Nausea

22%

36%

0.032

Nausea severity scale

Post-op time

Number of patients (%)

Severity 

Number of patients (%)

Severity

P value

01 h: (%)

4 (8%)

Mild: 1

9 (18%)

Mild: 4

0.046

Moderate: 1

Moderate: 3

Severe: 2

Severe: 2

12 h: (%)

6 (12%)

Mild: 3

12 (24%)

Mild: 5

0.021

Moderate: 2

Moderate: 5

Severe: 1

Severe: 2

24 h: (%)

2 (4%)

Mild: 1

8 (16%)

Mild: 4

0.011

Moderate: 1

Moderate: 3

Severe: 0

Severe: 1

48 h: (%)

2 (2%)

Mild: 2

4 (8%)

Mild: 2

0.565

Moderate: 0

Moderate: 0

Severe: 0

Severe: 2

824: h (%)

0

Mild: 0

0

Mild: 0

0.99

Moderate: 0

Moderate: 0

Severe: 0

Severe: 0

Incidence of vomiting: n (%)

4 (8%)

9 (18%)

0.045

Episodes of vomiting (n)– 1/2/≥3

2/2/0

3/2/4

-

Rescue medications (%)

5 (10%)

8 (16%)

0.037

  • No adverse events linked to treatment were reported in the amisulpride group.

Conclusions

  • A single 5 mg IV dose of amisulpride given intra‑operatively at the end of surgery was non‑inferior to 4 mg ondansetron in reducing the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

Indian J Anaesth. 2026;70:358-65.