The Clinical Implications of Long-Term Glycemic Variability in Patients with T2DM
calendar
25 Nov, 24

 

Introduction

Glycemic variability (GV) encompasses hypoglycemic episodes and post-prandial increases along with the fluctuations occurring at a specific time on different days over periods of weeks-months (referred to as: long-term GV). Long-term GV has emerged as a prognostic marker (predicting the risk of micro- and macrovascular diseases and death) in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), independent of glycemic control. The prognostic role of GV in terms of the risk of micro- and macrovascular disease or mortality has not been studied well in diabetes patients in Saudi Arabia.

Aim

To assess the prognostic value of long-term GV for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the local population in Saudi Arabia. The study also determined the prognostic value of long-term GV for diabetic microvascular complications (DMC) and its association with antidiabetic medications.

Patient Profile

  • Patients with T2DM (age ≥18 years, n=680)

Pregnant women, individuals with prediabetes and those with type-1 diabetes mellitus were excluded from the study.

Methods

Study Design

  • A retrospective cohort study

Outcomes

  • Incidence of MACE (the composite of; total death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization due to heart failure, and revascularization)
  • Incidence of DMC

Assessments

  • GV was calculated for two glycemic control markers: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood sugar (FBS); using three metrics- standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and variability independent from the mean (VIM).

Results

  • Mean age of the study population was 66 years, 49% of the study population comprised of men. Median and interquartile ranges of the minimum FBS readings were 116 mg/dL. Baseline eGFR for the study population was 78.00 ml/min/1.73m2.
  • As per a Cox proportional analysis, age, male sex, and co-morbid conditions were strongly associated with MACE: in descending order; chronic heart failure [hazard ratio (HR): 3.96; P <0.001), coronary artery disease (HR: 3.68, P < 0.001), hypertension (HR: 3.16, P =0.007), and chronic kidney disease (HR: 2.51, P =0.001).
  • The mean values of both glycemic control markers; HbA1c and FBS significantly predicted MACE (Table 1).

Table 1: Hazard ratio for various metrics of GV parameters with regards to MACE risk

Metrics

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P Value

HbA1c (%)

Mean

1.132 (0.997-1.284)

0.055

SD (High vs. low)

1.17 (0.771-1.798)

0.451

CV 100 (high vs. low)

1.006 (0.979-1.033)

0.675

VIM (High vs. low)

1.050 (0.688-1.602)

0,823

FBS (mg/dL)

Mean

1.005 (1.001-1.009)

0.018

SD (High vs. low)

1.673 (1.083-2.583)

0.020

CV 100 (high vs. low)

1.758 (1.136-2.723)

0.011

VIM (High vs. low)

1.354 (0.883-2.075)

0.164

CV: Coefficient of variation, HbA1c: Glycosylated hemoglobin, FBS: Fasting blood sugar, SD: Standard deviation, VIM: Variability independent from the mean    

  • As per multivariate analyses, the glycemic variability of FBS significantly predicted MACE, independent of glycemic control and other factors.
  • Glycemic parameters for both HbA1c and FBS were significantly associated with DMC. As per a multivariate analysis, diabetes duration and glycemic control independently predicted DMC.
  • Patients on metformin, and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, had the lowest GV, as compared with those being treated with insulin/ sulphonylureas (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

  • Long-term GV independently predicted MACE in patients with T2DM.
  • For the given population, FBS appeared to be the strongest metric to assess GV.
  • Patients on metformin and DPP-4 inhibitor therapy had a lower GV as compared to those on insulin/sulphonylureas.

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):24062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74535-w.